| About the Wheel | Advertise | Contact Us Welcome, Guest [ login | register]

Going All the Way: Gregg Scores With ‘Choke’

By Geoffrey Schorkopf Posted: 10/02/2008
Print ArticlePost a CommentEmail a Friend
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
click to enlarge
Jessica Miglio/Fox Searchlight
I had never been to Boston before, much less just to see a movie. The farthest I had ever traveled for a film was 20 miles, and the little I knew about Bostonians I learned from “Good Will Hunting.” So naturally, I thought most of them were annoying, Irish drunks.

Funny how 24 hours, 2,000 miles and one brief interaction with Mel Gibson can change your perception of a place.

There I sat, in Boston for the first time in my life, at the Ritz Carlton, admiring the compulsively perfect organization of the staff and eyeing the questionably artistic glass tubes of apples that accentuated the lobby tabletops. The hotel smelled of rich oak wood and aerosol spray that imitated the aroma chocolate-chip cookies — the very best way to ruin the ozone. Everyone in the room smacked of aristocracy, from the men with bow ties to the women in black cocktail dresses.

Then in walked Clark Gregg, writer and director of the sex-addict dark comedy “Choke,” wearing vibrantly pastel kicks and blue jeans that truly stood out in a room of formal normalcy, ready to talk to the Wheel about sex, drugs and rock ‘n’ roll.

Gregg spent more than five years working and reworking his directorial debut “Choke,” an adaptation of the novel written by cult-phenom Chuck Palahniuk of Fight Club fame, tiptoeing the line between success and failure during production.

“For a while, we really didn’t know if anyone would be able to see the movie,” Gregg says. “It opened on the last day of Sundance, after no other films were being picked up [by producers]. Who wants to pick up a movie about a Colonial-reenacting sex addict in a romantic comedy?”

But Fox Searchlight did purchase the film at a budget of $4 million, believing it would sell to the college demographic. After all, many American universities, including Emory and nearly 100 colleges throughout the city of Boston, have become breeding grounds for hookups, one-night stands and friends with benefits. In “Choke,” Gregg claims the current generation’s sex fixation is more serious than other culturally common addictions.

“Sex addition is highly prevalent in [the current] generation; more so even than alcohol, gambling and drugs,” he says.

But Gregg argues that the fixation on sex in “Choke” is a vehicle for deeper emotional and comedic episodes surrounding main character Victor Mancini (played aptly by Sam Rockwell).

“In order to be hugged, [Victor] can’t ask for a hug,” Gregg says. “He has to choke himself, hope someone will save and then hold him for a few minutes.”

Gregg was especially influenced by the incredible story of the origins of Palahniuk’s novel of the same name.

“Chuck’s father was a sex addict and was murdered by the husband” of the woman his father was sleeping with, Gregg says. “After the funeral, [Palahniuk] got out of his car and turned on the high beams because he knew a police officer or medical person would come hold him. That’s where he got this idea about fooling people into loving him. So he wrote a book about it.”

As Gregg and I continued to debate about the connections and merits of love and sex, a shadowy figure in a dark overcoat walked up to us from the other side of the hotel.

It was Mel Gibson.

I blinked my eyes a few times, and before I could say “freeeeeedom!” Gregg was standing and chatting it up with the Academy award-winning actor/director/super-Christian.

Apparently — in Gibson’s own words — he was in Boston “shooting a f--king movie, man.” After Gibson and I made our brief introductions, he left and Gregg continued the interview.

“I swear that wasn’t just to impress you,” Gregg says with a laugh. “We were in [‘We Were Soldiers’] together.”

After shaking off the just-saw-“Mad Max” vibes, our interview went in a new direction. Gibson inspired a completely different series of conversations about actors-turned-directors, and what Gregg referred to as “cast brotherhood” and masculinity on screen.

“I mostly directed ... except the scenes where I play the boss,” Gregg adds. “I don’t know how [Mel Gibson] does it. That man is an incredible force of nature.”

“A male character has difficulty asking for love,” Gregg says. He believes that below the many layers of obsessive eroticism, Victor Mancini is still a college male at heart. This is why Gregg chose to target the university crowd with this film, especially in a big college city like Boston.

In conversations about “Choke,” he says, “college students seem to have the strongest grasp on the deeper concepts in the film.”

Before leaving to go to a Q&A screening specifically for Emerson College students, he added: “I’ll be interested in what [college students] have to say … and what Mel has to say, too.”

So this is my first taste of what Boston is like: filled with charismatic indie directors, fancy and aromatic hotels, millions of sexually worked up college kids — and of course, one workaholic anti-Semite.

How ’bout them apples?

— Contact Geoff Schorkopf

Reader Discussion
Username
click here to login
Comments
Recent Commentstotal comments: 1
Nik wrote on Oct 3rd, 2008 9:21am:
About your statement that Mel Gibson is a 'workaholic anti-Semite'. Don't misrepresent your personal opinion as an established, rational fact. It has been said many times, by many people before and unfortunately still needs repeating. One actually has to believe people are never unfair, or that drunk people are never unfair, to consider this one-time remark in over 50 years of life proof that a person is a bigot. And as for 'In vino veritas', as in 'in wine lies truth'. What truth would that be exactly? Alcohol is not an intelligent, sleigh substance, let's not overstate it's abilities. Just like it isn't smart enough to selectively target and effect the functioning of just one leg, it isn't smart enough to selectively tamper with just one of the standards we set in day-to-day life, it effects them all equally and makes us do all sorts of stupid things we normally do not agree with. It can indeed, granted, unlock the lock that normally prevents us from speaking certain truths, it can just as easily however unlock our control system in the exact opposite way and make us yield to becoming unfair, to taking a cheap shot - especially if we feel cornered and bullied. And I don´t think anyone could honestly maintain they would not feel attacked and bullied if ever arrested, it is just an instinctive and natural reaction to having your freedom taken away. This once in a lifetime occurrence should not be misrepresented as the opposite, a characteristic trait - and yet it often is. If everyone who had ever misbehaved would be considered unreliable not a lot of people would be able to consider themselves trustworthy, stable, decent human beings anymore. And there wouldn't be a lot of people we could trust. Contrary to those continually attacking Mel Gibson and showing no remorse, Mel Gibson himself only on one occasion misbehaved and he actually apologized for it afterwards – stating it was untrue, stating in other words that it was unfair, that he had taken a one-time drunken cheap shot and regretted doing so, regretted the pain and the fear it caused. More and more people, regardless of whether they are or are not Mel Gibson fans, are becoming increasingly alarmed by these continual attacks, by the amount of hatred and callous condescension coming his way based on this one-time event for which he apologized. The time we are willing to take these types of continual attacks seriously is over - it is all beginning to look a lot like bigotry, like indulgence in a hateful, unbalanced, black-and-white attitude itself. And those who claim they are opposed to Mel Gibson because they assume he has a hateful attitude, should at least themselves not engage in these types of attitudes when judging people and events. These attitudes are the foundation on which bigotry is built. Whether Mel Gibson is or is not a bigot remains to be seen, one thing is clear however, many of those who oppose Mel Gibson in this way are at least themselves infected with the disease of hatred and bigotry they claim he is infected with.
disclaimer | privacy policy





Top Stories


Related Stories

Most Read
Most Read
Latest
Latest
Most Commented
Most Commented