My mom called me Tuesday afternoon to tell me that one of my former professors was calling me dumb on TV.
Granted, it wasn’t “me” he was talking about. It was all of us, all of us who are under 30 at least. We are, according to Emory English professor Mark Bauerlein, not to be trusted due to our stupidity. Not the kind of thing you want your mom to see coming out of one from your professor. It was like a nationally broadcast parent-teacher conference from hell.
I didn’t make it to CNN’s Headline News in time to see Bauerlein discussing his book, The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future, but just in case the title doesn’t speak enough for itself, we can look at an interview Bauerlein gave The Hub last fall. Here’s Bauerlein explaining why he decided to write the book:
“Because in my limited experience as a teacher, I’ve noticed in the last 10 years that students are no less intelligent, no less ambitious but there are two big differences: Reading habits have slipped, along with general knowledge. You can quote me on this: You guys don’t know anything.”
Kind of harsh, huh? But Bauerlein’s not the only one who thinks Americans are adverse to general knowledge. Former Washington Post journalist and author Susan Jacoby has just written a book denouncing what she sees as modern America’s trend toward anti-intellectualism. Titled, The Age of American Unreason, Jacoby, according to a Feb. 14 New York Times article on the book, was inspired to write it on Sept. 11, 2001, after hearing two well-dressed men discussing the attacks on the World Trade Center in terms of the bombing of Pearl Harbor. One of the pair tried to explain Pearl Harbor to the other, and landed, according to Jacoby and the article, on this explanation:
“That was when the Vietnamese dropped bombs in a harbor, and it started the Vietnam War.” That’s the only line we’re given. I’ve looked at it, trying to find some semblance of sarcasm, that maybe this guy was just messing with his friend, that perhaps only 50 percent of the population is as dumb as Bauerlein and Jacoby want us to believe. I couldn’t find it.
Maybe they have a point: According to a survey commissioned by Common Core, a group that promotes the liberal arts in public schools, 25 percent of their focus group of 17-year-olds was under the impression that Columbus discovered America sometime after 1750. Did the individuals giving the survey even bother to ask them the rest of the history questions?
Of course, one must ask, why is knowledge necessary? If I were a shoe salesman with no dreams of ever appearing on “Who Wants to Be A Millionaire?,” then would I really need to know that 1492 was when Columbus sailed the ocean blue? No major religious tradition has Alex Trebek guarding the gates of paradise. You don’t even need much knowledge (or common sense, for that matter) to become rich (Paris Hilton), famous (Vince Young, he of the dismal Wonderlic score), or powerful (oh, you know who I’m talking about.)
Bauerlein begs to differ. He says that such general knowledge is the basis of our democracy, that our Founding Fathers intended us to have an educated background so we could make sound political decisions. And it’s tough to argue against knowledge. How can it be bad to know when Columbus sailed, or, to pick other examples from the Common Core survey, what famous novel Ralph Ellison wrote and what Hitler’s position was during World War II. (A quarter of students identified him as a weapons manufacturer or as an Austrian premier or as the Kaiser. Apparently, they did keep asking those kids the history questions.)
That being said, I do think it’s unfair — not to mention a little pretentious — to decry an entire generation for its stupidity. The infamous “maps” speech delivered by the South Carolina beauty queen is hardly representative of America’s youth. Surely the rest of us are learning something from our lives?
In his book Everything Bad is Good For You, Steven Johnson claims that all the TV we’re watching and all the video games we’re playing are actually helping us by developing different parts of our brain. By keeping track of lengthy plotlines on “The Sopranos” or complex emotional relationships between characters in reality TV, we’re developing the sort of recall needed to maintain a real social network, and by making decisions as to what to do with our in-game avatars we’re learning problem solving — adaptation, improvisation. I don’t know if I buy his argument though, because those kinds of skills sound an awful lot like what kids are supposed to learn when they go out for recess or play with their dolls or Ninja Turtles. Catch-22 has multiple plotlines too, and I find it infinitely more rewarding than an episode of “Make Me A Supermodel.”
So how do we get people to start reading again? If we are really growing to be this stupid, then what are we doing about it? Should we roll back the clock, destroy all televisions and cell phones in a reversal of the classic Fahrenheit 451 scenario? Or do we just offer them free pizza, as Pizza Hut’s seemingly ubiquitous “Book-It” program does?
I think the point isn’t that we may be dumber than any preceding generation. It’s that we have the opportunity to be smarter than any of them, and we’re not taking it. We have access to more knowledge, more facts, more data than we know what to do with. If I didn’t know when Columbus discovered America, for instance, or who the king of England was when the Magna Carta was signed, then I just have to Google it, and I’m sure I could find a reputable source.
But the Internet isn’t a replacement for memory — the fact that one can look up Iraq’s position on a 3-D globe doesn’t excuse not knowing where it is in the first place. Access to knowledge isn’t the same thing as knowledge. Our challenge is to turn the torrent of information at our disposal — information on former presidents, literary masterpieces and, yes, even “The Sopranos” — into something we — and everyone else, for that matter — can actually learn from. And with our knowledge, we’ll be ready the next time the Vietnamese bomb Pearl Harbor.
Editorials Editor Eric Betts is a College junior from Eufaula, Ala.
Reader Discussion
Recent Comments
total comments: 10
ButReally wrote on Jul 28th, 2008 10:17am:
This anti-intellectualism song has been sung before and Dr. Bauerlein's voice does not do it justice. We get it: Don't just pretend to read. Actually read. Actually learn rather than skim. Deepen our intellectual capacity rather than widen of pop cultural trivia base (side bar: but when was the last time we won free pizza for getting an 'A' on our midterm exam.) So okay, rather than buying into what Bauerlein's oversized ego is selling let's take a history lesson. Read Richard Hofstadter's 1963 treatise on the American tradition of anti-intellectualism and be proud students, you're only being patriotic. Perhaps we'll be more inclined to care when Bauerlein wins his own pulitzer with some original work (and maybe picks up a Miss Manner's Guide in between research his next insult).
Mary wrote on May 17th, 2008 3:25pm:
This is also the first generation to have spent their high school years learning how to take tests instead of how to think. Perhaps college admission should focus more on the content of essays and less on SAT scores. Or at least, put those scores in perspective.
GeorgiaSon wrote on May 17th, 2008 9:47am:
I'm not sure Mr. Betts gets it yet, and trying to explain it to him would take too long. Just a brief comment for the record: It's not, Mr. Betts, just knowing isolated facts. It's what not having any framework at all for the broad sweep of history tells us about your overall mental capacity and ability to understand the current world.
2. The proof of what I just said is not shown by how many facts you have or how many you might acquire Via Google. The proof of your dumbness is shown by your unpreparedness when you enter college. It's shown by the number of remedial courses required for members of your generation to get through even the non-challenging pap that passes for higher education at most of our universities.
But most of all, it's shown by the judgment of the business world that, even after getting through college, you are woefully unprepared for even an entry-level job at most companies.
None of that is something you can remedy by accessing Google to learn facts. The fact that you, the editor of a college newspaper, still just don't get it is frightening.
SmarterThanA5thGrader wrote on May 13th, 2008 5:17pm:
I think it really comes down to common sense. This generation is not "dumber", they just have had different life experiences, and less in a common sense sense. This generation seems really stupid because they have not related to people personally - in their face (not facebook). This lack of personal interaction leaves them very unpolished and thus seemingly stupid in a face to face setting. Laughing at stupid job interviews via cellphones, I am.
amie wrote on May 12th, 2008 11:24pm:
I teach at a not-so-well-known university, and I interact with freshmen and sophomores on a daily basis. G-d bless their sweet, innocent souls, some of these kids are dumber than a bag of hammers. Not that they lack native intellectual capacity, but they are distinctly without motivation, curiosity, general knowledge and the ability to read simple instructions. What my students have in bountiful quantity is the chutzpah to ask how I could give them a "C" when they tried their best... They don't like the answer that there is no "A for Effort" only "A for 90% or better." (yeah, I'm heartless...)
flavius wrote on May 9th, 2008 8:59pm:
GustavStrabonskayinkizky, I must respectfully disagree with you. I have been more than frustrated by the blatant stupidity of my classmates and I get the gut feeling Mr. Bauerlein is right.
john_978 wrote on May 3rd, 2008 11:12pm:
"Not the kind of thing you want your mom to see coming out of one from your professor."
I would have to agree with the professor.
GustavStrabonskayinkizky wrote on May 3rd, 2008 12:19am:
I just read the first paragraphs, and it seems he doesn't have any scientific information to back his claims up, plus he is generalizing so none of his arguments are really worth listening to.
I say that professor should be fired.
jlopiphi wrote on May 2nd, 2008 6:58pm:
I am 27 years old and work in academia at a well-known university. I have to interact daily with freshman and I have to agree with Bauerlein and Jacoby. Each year I feel like the incoming freshman class is dumber than the previous class. Their lack of common knowledge has made me very weary from repeating myself. I have grown more apathetic towards their attitudes.
AdmYamamoto wrote on Mar 4th, 2008 3:43am:
We wouldn't dare awaken a sleeping giant like you.